Showing posts with label PACS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PACS. Show all posts
Monday, November 12, 2012
Occupy Elections - Post Mortem
A quick post mortem of the 2012 cluster fuck of an election. A total of $6 billion spent to elect a corporate candidate. How Bernie Sanders ran an actual re-election campaign with no TV, radio or direct mail ads. A possible backlash against Super PAC's and the ridiculous idea of voting being either patriotic or a civic duty. [Click to Listen]
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Occupy Elections - F**k Voting (Part II)
Let's say you have picked a candidate for the Presidency of the United States. After all the primary debates, campaign stops, stump speeches, conventions, ads, mailings, robo-calls, PAC's, Super PAC's, canvassing, the debates (including third party debates), yard signs, billboards and get out the vote campaigns - you have finally chosen someone to vote for. Great! But, guess what? There is a growing chance that your vote just won't count. I this episode, we take a look at information from a few different sources that expose the problems with using machines to count our votes. Books by Mark Crispin Miller and Greg Palast as well as the fantastic citizen reporting from Bev Harris at Black Box Voting. It's all enough to make you say "F**k Voting!". [Click to Listen]
Thursday, November 1, 2012
Occupy Elections - F**k Voting (Part I)
In part I, we take a look at who actually votes. With all the corporate media hype about how important every election cycle is, why are almost half of registered voters staying home on (S)election day? Also, we get into who works the polls on (S)election day and how there will be no one to work the polls in a few years. [Click to Listen]
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Occupy Elections - Third Party Voting
A brief history of some recent third party candidates as well as some Gallup poll data which indicates that almost half of the country identifies as "Independent" in their political ideology. Seems like the perfect environment for a massive switch towards a new political paradigm. The question then should be 'why vote for one of the two corporate candidates?' and not 'why vote third party?'. [Click to Listen]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)